💡 Why everyone in the UK keeps asking “who’s top of OnlyFans?”

You see the headlines: a creator tweets a single number, tabloids gobble it up, and suddenly people in the pub are arguing whether an influencer’s bank account is real or PR. For anyone thinking of creating, managing talent, or just curious how the creator economy actually pays, the main questions are practical: who’s genuinely making bank, how much does the platform keep, and what does that mean for a UK-based creator trying to turn clicks into rent money?

This article cuts through the noise. I’ll walk you through the latest, verifiable figures from platform reports and recent press, show a compact table you can scan in seconds, and then unpack what the numbers mean for creators and managers in the UK. Expect straight talk — no glamour shots — and pointers you can actually use if you’re plotting a strategy or just nosy about earnings.

📊 Quick-money snapshot: who’s getting paid (and how much the platform keeps)

🧑‍🎤 Creator / Entity💰 2024 Figure📈 Note
Sophie Rain$83,000,000Reported 2024 earnings cited in multiple outlets — big outlier among creator claims.
OnlyFans — total user spend (2024)$7,200,000,000Record platform-wide paid spend reported by OnlyFans for the year.
OnlyFans take rate20%Standard platform commission — creators keep ~80% before taxes/fees.
OnlyFans — pre-tax profit£509,500,000Company reported a rise in pre-tax profits, showing platform-level growth even if average creator income fluctuates.
Corporation tax paid in UK£167,000,000Reported tax payments in the UK where the company is based.

That table gives you the headline picture: platform spends are huge ($7.2bn), the firm keeps 20% and reported strong profits, and individual creator claims (like Sophie Rain’s) can be jaw-droppers when they happen. The important bit is this: platform health ≠ guaranteed creator wealth. Big platform revenue doesn’t automatically lift every creator — most of the cash concentrates at the top, while many creators earn modest amounts once fees, tax, and expenses are factored in.

😎 MaTitie SHOW TIME

Hi — I’m MaTitie. I poke around weird corners of the web, test the tech every creator asks about, and I’m the guy who’ll tell you whether a VPN will actually let you stream without lag. Short version: if you care about privacy or want reliable access to content platforms from the UK, a VPN still matters.

If you want something fast, private and reliable for streaming or content access, try NordVPN here: 👉 🔐 Try NordVPN now — 30-day risk-free.

MaTitie disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you buy something through them, MaTitie might earn a small commission. Cheers for the support.

💡 What the numbers actually mean for UK creators (the gritty bit)

Let’s cut to the chase. That 20% platform cut is fine as a headline — but creators don’t get to cash the whole 80% either. You’ve got:

  • Taxes: UK-based creators must consider income tax, National Insurance and possibly VAT depending on business structure. That chunk can be sizable.
  • Costs: content production, collaborators, promo, managers, payment processor fees, and content moderation tools.
  • Platform mix: many top creators diversify — subscriptions, pay-per-view DMs, PPV clips, tips, sponsorships and external merch or Patreon-like offers. That diversification is key because platform-only revenue can be volatile.
  • Visibility: the real limiter is discoverability. A handful of creators with huge followings (and cross-platform fame) get the lion’s share of paid spend.

Sophie Rain’s reported $83m (2024) is an outlier worth discussing. Outlets have been running with that number — and when someone publicly claims that level of income, it makes people assume “everybody can do that.” They can’t. It usually takes a mix of scale, timing, viral attention, and often outside business deals. For context, OnlyFans reported record platform spend last year — $7.2bn — but that gets split across millions of creators and multiple revenue streams. The platform’s own profits rose too, showing macro demand, but that doesn’t translate into even income distribution.

Recent UK coverage also highlights the emotional and social toll of high-profile creator careers. The Economic Times ran a piece on Lily Phillips’ family begging her to quit OnlyFans — a reminder that income figures have human consequences beyond the ledger. [The Economic Times, 2025-08-29]

Meanwhile public defenders of creator choice — like comments reported from Bethenny Frankel — frame the debate differently: focus on autonomy and labour rights for creators rather than moral panic. [AOL, 2025-08-29]

If you’re a UK creator, manager, or brand, here’s what to take away:

  • Don’t base plans on viral outliers — use conservative revenue models.
  • Diversify your revenue and audience sources: subs, tips, external platforms, sponsorships.
  • Budget for taxes and professional help (accountant + legal advice pays off).
  • Consider your public narrative: big earnings attract scrutiny and can affect relationships and mental health.

📢 Real-world chatter and recent headlines (what the press is saying)

  • Sophie Rain’s claims of earning more than big-name sports salaries set off a media storm and comparisons across outlets — proof that sensational numbers sell headlines. [SPORTbible, 2025-08-28]

  • Stories like Lily Phillips’ family drama show the social consequences that sometimes accompany creator fame — a reminder this is personal labour, not just spreadsheets. [The Economic Times, 2025-08-29]

  • Public figures defending creator choice help shift the narrative away from stigma — useful context for anyone who worries about reputational fallout. [AOL, 2025-08-29]

🙋 Frequently Asked Questions

Who actually earns the most on OnlyFans in 2024–25?

💬 Answer: Big, public claims exist — Sophie Rain is the headline example with multiple outlets reporting very large 2024 earnings. But media-reported sums are often outliers and should be treated cautiously; platform totals show big money circulates, but it’s concentrated at the top.

🛠️ How much does OnlyFans take, and how much do creators really keep?

💬 Answer: OnlyFans keeps a 20% cut. Creators therefore receive ~80% of gross payments, but you must subtract taxes, business costs, payment fees and promotion expenses. Net take-home varies massively by creator and niche.

🧠 If I’m UK-based, what’s the best way to turn OnlyFans into a stable business?

💬 Answer: Diversify revenue (merch, sponsorships, other platforms), get an accountant, reinvest in content discovery and audience growth, and protect your privacy and mental health. Don’t rely on single-viral events — build incremental, repeatable income streams.

🧩 Final Thoughts…

OnlyFans is big money on a macro level: billions of dollars spent by users and strong company profits. But that macro wealth doesn’t mean even, guaranteed riches for every creator in the UK. A few go massively viral and claim huge incomes; most creators earn modestly once you factor in platform fees, taxes, and costs. If you’re plotting a creator career, treat sensational headlines as inspiration — not a business plan.

📚 Further Reading

Here are 3 recent articles that give more context to this topic — all selected from verified sources. Feel free to explore 👇

🔸 “Daisy Drew TikTok: Viral clips fueling her OnlyFans rise”
🗞️ Source: EasternHerald – 📅 2025-08-29
🔗 Read Article

🔸 “Sexting With an AI Bot? Third of Singles Thinks It’s Cheating”
🗞️ Source: Newsweek – 📅 2025-08-28
🔗 Read Article

🔸 “OnlyFans Model Sparks Drama With Lil Baby & Lil Yachty”
🗞️ Source: AllHipHop – 📅 2025-08-29
🔗 Read Article

😅 A Quick Shameless Plug (Hope You Don’t Mind)

If you’re creating on OnlyFans, Fansly, or similar platforms — don’t let your content go unnoticed.

🔥 Join Top10Fans — the global ranking hub built to spotlight creators like YOU.

✅ Ranked by region & category

✅ Trusted by fans in 100+ countries

🎁 Limited-Time Offer: Get 1 month of FREE homepage promotion when you join now!

🔽 Join Now 🔽

📌 Disclaimer

This post blends publicly available information with editorial analysis and a dash of AI assistance. It’s intended for information and discussion, not as legal, tax, or financial advice. Numbers cited are from public reporting and may be revised; always check primary sources and consult professionals for personal decisions.