🔎 So… who has the most OnlyFans subs right now?
This is the question that refuses to die in creator circles and pub chats alike: who actually has the most OnlyFans subscribers? If you’ve ever tried to find a clean, official answer, you’ll have clocked the problem — there isn’t one. OnlyFans doesn’t publish a public leaderboard, and creators rarely share verified subscriber counts. When they do, it’s usually a snapshot for hype, not a long-term average.
Here’s the bit we can say with certainty. OnlyFans is a London-based subscription platform where creators keep 80% of subscription revenue and the platform takes 20%. It’s not just adult; fitness coaches, musicians, and mainstream celebs have all had a go. As far back as 2023, public reporting pegged the service at well over 200 million registered users and 3+ million creators, and those top-line numbers have since marched on. Business filings and coverage show FY revenue and creator accounts still climbing into late 2024 and 2025. In other words, the pie got bigger — and louder. [Business Insider, 2025-08-22]
If you’re asking “who’s number one?”, you’re really asking two things: who can trigger the biggest subscriber spike, and who sustains the most paid members month-over-month. Those aren’t always the same person. Celeb launches can smash it for 30 days. But the creators who quietly retain 30–60% of renewals, bundle smart, and nail upsells often win the year. Let’s cut the fluff and look at the evidence we do have — then I’ll show you how to spot the real leaders, even without an official scoreboard.
📊 OnlyFans by the numbers: growth that hides the leaderboard
📅 Year | 💳 Gross Spend (US$) | 💸 Payout to Creators (US$) | 👥 Creator Accounts | 📐 Derived Avg per Creator (US$) |
---|---|---|---|---|
FY ending Nov 2023 | 6.600.000.000 | 5.300.000.000 | 4.100.000 | 1.293 |
FY ending Nov 2024 | 7.200.000.000 | 5.800.000.000 | 4.600.000 | 1.260 |
Where’s that from? Public coverage of the platform’s filings shows users spent about $7.2B in FY ending Nov 2024, up from $6.6B a year earlier, while creator accounts rose roughly 13% year-on-year to 4.6M, and payouts climbed to $5.8B. That’s big-boy numbers, and they underscore why the owner could pull a combined ~$700M in dividends in the past year while exploring a potential sale — a saga you’ve probably seen splashed across headlines. [Business Insider, 2025-08-22] [Forbes, 2025-08-22] [Yahoo, 2025-08-23]
But here’s the twist the table reveals. The average payout per creator barely budged — in fact, it dipped slightly. That suggests classic power-law dynamics: more creators are joining, the total pot is bigger, but the top slice still takes a disproportionate share. Translation: a small cluster likely holds a huge chunk of the subs and revenue, but we can’t name them definitively without platform-verified counts. That’s why “who has the most subs?” is harder than it looks.
😎 MaTitie SHOW TIME
I’m MaTitie — your friendly neighbourhood deal hunter and the slightly cheeky bloke behind this post. I’ve tried more VPNs than I’ve had full English breakfasts (no judgement), and I’m big on keeping your browsing private and your streaming smooth.
Reality check, mate: platforms get blocked, throttled, or geo-limited. If you want fast, fuss-free access to places like OnlyFans, TikTok, and the usual suspects while keeping your IP under wraps, a proper VPN is priceless. After testing a silly number of them, NordVPN is the one I actually renew with my own quid — quick, reliable, and painless to use.
If you fancy a go, here’s the easy button: 👉 🔐 Try NordVPN now — 30-day risk-free. Works a treat in the UK, and you can cancel for a full refund if it’s not for you.
Affiliate note: MaTitie earns a small commission if you buy via the link. Cheers for the support — it keeps the lights on.
🧭 Who’s really on top? Reading the signals without being mugged off
First, the boring-but-true bit: OnlyFans doesn’t share a public ranking of subscribers, and creators’ “Top 0.01%” badges are percentile earnings bands, not sub counts. So if you see a viral claim like “X has 1M subs”, pause. It might be a momentary peak, a misread of PPV revenue, or pure bluster.
Here’s how industry folks read the room:
Spike vs. stickiness
- Spike: mainstream celeb launches, big-name athlete drop-ins, or TV-driven press cycles. These can stack tens of thousands of subs in days at a mid-tier price point. Churn is often brutal within 1–2 billing cycles.
- Stickiness: niche creators with tight communities, consistent content cadence, and smart pricing/bundles. They often run lower headline prices but thrive on renewals, tips, customs, and PPV upsells.
Price tells a story
Hefty monthly prices don’t necessarily mean more subs. In fact, the highest sub counts tend to cluster at mass-market pricing (think ~£7–£12), with higher-priced creators extracting more per fan via PPV and bespoke content. Winners pick the lane that suits their audience, not their ego.The maths (rough, but useful)
- If a creator hints they’re making around £100k/month at £10, surface-level logic says ~10k active subs. But…
- Discounts, bundles, free trials, chargebacks, and PPV can sway that by 20–50%.
- So we bracket it: “best-case subs” (gross ÷ headline price) vs “net subs” (after discounts and non-sub revenue). The truth sits somewhere in between.
Public proxies you can actually check
- Social followings and recent growth (Instagram, X, TikTok)
- Search interest spikes (Google Trends)
- Discount frequency and price testing (how often they run £5 promos or 50% off)
- Creator-to-creator collabs (cross-promo brings sub surges)
- Retention tells: creators talking openly about renewals, loyal chat activity, daily posts
Put that together and you can spot likely leaders even without a formal list. The “most subs” crown typically rotates among mainstream names during launch windows and a handful of relentless niche moguls the press rarely covers. As of August 2025, the platform is still in growth mode, liquidity is high, and whales are absolutely a thing — but the quiet retention beasts are the ones sleeping well at night.
💡 What the money trail says about “most subs”
Follow the money, not the tweets. Coverage of official filings shows users spent ~$7.2B on OnlyFans in FY ending Nov 2024, with $5.8B going to creators — and the owner collecting monster dividends while exploring a sale. That scale means there are undeniably creators raking six to seven figures a month, and some of those will be subscriber-heavy rather than PPV-heavy. [Business Insider, 2025-08-22] [Forbes, 2025-08-22] [Yahoo, 2025-08-23]
Still, “highest revenue” isn’t always “most subs”. Some creators keep prices intentionally low to inflate sub counts (social proof, ranking visibility, DM monetisation), while others skew high-ticket and let PPV carry the day. That’s why you’ll see conflicting rumours: one camp chases the big headline number of subs; the other quietly prints bigger monthly revenue with fewer, higher-value fans.
From where we sit at Top10Fans — tracking social signals and demand across 100+ markets — the median UK fan doesn’t care who has the absolute most subs. They care if the content’s consistent, the DMs are real, and the value feels worth a tenner. Creators who get that right often scale past the splashy names within 3–6 months.
📌 The truth in one line
There’s no public, verified “most OnlyFans subs” winner today. But the leaders are almost certainly a blend of:
- A-list launchers during newsy moments (spikes), and
- Community-first creators with relentless retention (sustained subs).
If you’re a creator, pick your lane and optimise ruthlessly. If you’re a fan, vote with your renewals.
🙋 Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does OnlyFans publish an official list of the most-subscribed creators?
💬 Nope. OnlyFans doesn’t publish a public leaderboard for subscriber counts. Most ‘rank’ claims you see are self-reported or guessed from prices and earnings. Treat them as estimates, not gospel.
🛠️ How can I estimate a creator’s subs without hard data?
💬 Start with their monthly price and any public revenue hints, then factor in discounts, bundles, and tips/PPV. A rough formula is: subs ≈ monthly earnings ÷ average paid price. It’s messy, but it gets you in the ballpark.
🧠 Why do celebs seem to rocket to the top, then vanish?
💬 Celeb launches cause huge, short-lived spikes. Long-term retention wins the game. The quiet grinders with strong community and consistent value often out-earn flash-in-the-pan launches over 6–12 months.
🧩 Final Thoughts…
- OnlyFans keeps growing: ~$7.2B in user spend and 4.6M creators by late 2024/early 2025 coverage. That’s serious fuel for both spikes and long-term winners.
- Average earnings per creator are flat-ish, implying the top few percent capture most of the pie — so yes, there are “mega-sub” accounts, but no public list.
- If you’re building, obsess over retention, bundles, and DM value. If you’re browsing, follow the creators who show up consistently — they’re the ones worth your monthly quid.
📚 Further Reading
Here are 3 recent articles that give more context to this topic — all selected from verified sources. Feel free to explore 👇
🔸 TikTok-style vertical videos are set to conquer the porn industry
🗞️ Source: Tubefilter – 📅 2025-08-22
🔗 Read Article
🔸 Tennis star Sachia Vickery defends her OnlyFans account
🗞️ Source: Sporting News – 📅 2025-08-22
🔗 Read Article
🔸 OnlyFans owner paid £522m in dividends
🗞️ Source: Daily Mail – 📅 2025-08-23
🔗 Read Article
😅 A Quick Shameless Plug (Hope You Don’t Mind)
If you’re creating on OnlyFans, Fansly, or similar platforms — don’t let your content go unnoticed.
🔥 Join Top10Fans — the global ranking hub built to spotlight creators like YOU.
✅ Ranked by region & category
✅ Trusted by fans in 100+ countries
🎁 Limited-Time Offer: Get 1 month of FREE homepage promotion when you join now!
🔽 Join Now 🔽
📌 Disclaimer
This post blends publicly available information with a touch of AI assistance. It’s meant for sharing and discussion purposes only — not all details are officially verified. Please take it with a grain of salt and double-check when needed.